People in India are using Twitter to vent their anger about a new policy that supposedly prevents
women from wearing short skirts in bars and nightclubs in the city of Chandigarh.
Indian
media outlets reported that the Chandigarh administration would shut
down discotheques that allowed "scantily dressed women" and "indecency"
on their properties.
However, the policy entitled Controlling of Public Amusement 2016
does not contain any reference to an imposed dress code for women in
Chandigarh. Instead, the policy, which came into effect on 1 April,
states that a business could have its licence revoked if it has
"indecent" elements or if it displays images of "scantily dressed
women".
The policy reads: "The Noda Office may refuse issuance of
fresh permission certificate or revoke the existing permission
certificate for operation of business if it is considered to be indecent
or of a scurrilous character... [and] any exhibition or advertisement
whether by way of posters or in the newspapers, photographs of scantily
dressed women."
While the administration failed to establish or define the terms
"indecent" and "scantily dressed", there is no mention of women being
banned from wearing short skirts when going out in the evening. However,
many took to Twitter to complain that the new rules allowed authorities
to impose "moral policing" over what women wear.
Manish Goyal, a restaurateur in Chandigarh, told the Times of India:
"It's moral policing. How do you define a scantily dressed woman or
being indecent? It's all subjective. What you may find indecent, I may
find innocent. The administration should not reject permissions on such
parameters."
The High Court in Punjab and Haryana had ordered the
administration to frame the new nightlife policy to regulate the city's
bars and restaurants following violence outside clubs. In addition to
the dress code for women, the policy also addresses issues of political
issues relating to sedition.
The policy reads: "The nodal committee can revoke permission
for running business if it is considered to be seditious or likely to
incite political discontent [and] contains offensive reference to
personalities." It also notes that businesses are not allowed to "wound
the susceptibilities of any nation or followers of any religion".
Post a Comment