A new study from Microsoft researchers warns that many types of
databases used for electronic medical records are vulnerable to leaking
information despite the use of encryption.
The paper,
due to be presented at the ACM Conference on Computer and
Communications Security next month, shows how sensitive medical
information on patients could be pilfered using four different attacks.
Researchers discovered gender, race, age and admission information,
among other data, using real patient records from 200 U.S. hospitals.
In the light of increasing cyberattacks against the health care
industry, the researchers recommended that the systems they studied
"should not be used in the context of" electronic medical records.
They focused on encrypted relational databases based on the design of CryptDB, which allows SQL queries to be performed on scrambled data.
Databases of this design often use property-preserving encryption (PPE)
schemes to allow searching. PPE schemes have been long known to leak
non-trivial information, "but the extent to which these systems are
vulnerable, however, has never been investigated," they wrote.
CryptDB-based systems are often used by organizations because few
changes are required to the legacy database infrastructure and they run
on encrypted data in "the same way as they would operate on plaintext
data," according to the paper. Also, they're fast.
Encryption is seen as one of the best defenses against cyberattacks. If
information is recovered, the attackers would need the decryption keys
-- which are closely protected -- to read it.
But using encryption also means the data has be continually decrypted in
order to be useful. Often, encrypted information is decrypted in a
computer's memory, which is dangerous if cyberattackers can get access
to that.
"When the encrypted database is operating in a steady-state where enough
encryption layers have been peeled to permit the application to run its
queries, our experimental results show that an alarming amount of
sensitive information can be recovered," the researchers wrote.
One of their "cumulative" attacks discovered the "disease severity,
mortality risk, age, length of stay, admission month and admission type
of at least 80% of the patients for at least 95% of the largest 200
hospitals."
Although they focused on databases with electronic medical records, the
attacks would likely be successful against human resource or accounting
databases, as those systems often store the same kind of demographic
data.
The healthcare industry has been hit hard by hackers. One of the largest U.S. health insurers, Anthem, reported a data breach in February that exposed information on upwards of 80 million people.
The stolen data was never publicly released. Security experts said
forensic clues matched the methods used by a long-known China-based
group nicknamed Deep Panda.
About a month later, health insurer Premera said
customer data, including bank account and clinical data going back to
2002, may have been compromised in an attack, affecting 11 million
people.
Post a Comment